Analysing my game [Calling a river bet]:

So here we are again to look at a leak of my game. I call the river down to light, but before we come to the actual problems I try to give you some more background information about calling a river bet.
There are 4 situations where I call a riverbet.
We call a riverbet because if we raise better hands call and worse hands will fold.
We call a riverbet because the pot odds given.
We call a riverbet because we think villain is bluffing. (my leak)
We call a riverbet for information on how villain is playing.

1. We call a riverbet because if we raise better hands call and worse hands will fold.

It has a little to do with the reversed implied odds (RIO) and the Way Ahead/ Way Behind theorem. Here a small example:
Hero holds AK

Villain calls, Hero raises, Villain calls

Board: A25
Villain checks, Hero bets, Villain calls

Turn: J
Villain checks, Hero checks.

River: T
Villains leads out for 2/3 pot. Hero??

By showing a lot of weakness on the turn we are inducing bluffs from worse aces like AQ A9, A7, etc. So we should raise against them, but we are way behind against AJ AT A2 A5, wich is possible at 10NL. So the only thing we can do here is call the river. With betting the turn we achieve worse aces to fold and better aces to call, while checking induces to make a bluff on the river and reducing the RIO for ourselves. RIO’s come in to the hand when you betting a hand which is probably already beaten or only get called by better hands, while worse hands will fold.

2. We call the river because of the pot odds given.

We have AJ on a [6 9 T] [A] [J] board. Villain bets into us for ½ pot. Giving us 3 to 1 pot odds. Villain check called our cbet and frontbetted the ace, which Hero calls. On the river we are not sure were we stand. We have top two pair on a very drawy board (Only no flushdraw, but the range on villain says he is a strong player who likes to trap but also bluffs on dangerous boards. So we need to win only 25% with the 3 to 1 odds, with the read we have I think we beat those odds. So I call. This looks pretty similar to point 1, but here we are thinking we are behind more of the time, but ahead often enough to beat the pot odds giving. So here we are thinking call/fold. While above in the AK example we consider call/raise.

3. We call a riverbet because we think villain is bluffing. (my leak)

Here is a real example. I have [Ac Tc] on the BTN, it is limped around and I call. (Don’t play big pots with marginal hands, with big IO) Board [Qc 3c 8h] I call a bet, and villain and me are heads up. Turn [6c] Villain checks and I check to induce River [3s] Villain pushed allin, I make a crying call with the knowledge he probably has me beat. So where do I go wrong? I’m thinking to much in perspective to my own game. I make big bets on the river to bluff a scare card (I also bet big with big hands). So automatically I think a big bet is a bluff or a monster. But on this limits I should know big bets are more than 80% not a bluff so I should learn to lay down hands. Especially when donkys go out of line you have to be very aware about the strength of your hand. So this will be one of my focussing points for the next weeks. Before I make a call for a big pot I try to give myself some thinking seconds before I act. Sometimes I press call and afterwards I think I would have folded if I took some more time to go through the hand 1 more time.

4. We call a riverbet for information on how villain is playing.

This is one thing we don’t see very often but on the lower limits I ran into it once in a while. Lets say I C/R the flop with a combodraw but didn’t hit it on the river. My showdown value is ZERO. So I expect never to win here, but villain minbets the river 1BB in a 13BB pot. Because I think I gain more than 1BB from him with this information I get at showdown I will call this weakish bet. When he slowplayed a monster I should be very carefull when he minbets again.